0.03/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.13	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 240
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 03:07:34 EDT 2025
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.20/0.49	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.20/0.50	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t37hY4bCue/E---3.1_22244.p
24.29/3.57	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
24.29/3.57	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
24.29/3.57	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
24.29/3.57	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (3) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 240s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 240s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 240s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# full_lambda_6 with pid 22327 completed with status 0
24.29/3.57	# Result found by full_lambda_6
24.29/3.57	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
24.29/3.57	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
24.29/3.57	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (3) cores
24.29/3.57	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
24.29/3.57	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHHFFSBN
24.29/3.57	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
24.29/3.57	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 216s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 73s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Starting sh5l with 109s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# new_ho_10_unif with pid 22333 completed with status 0
24.29/3.57	# Result found by new_ho_10_unif
24.29/3.57	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA.
24.29/3.57	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
24.29/3.57	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 720s (3) cores
24.29/3.57	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
24.29/3.57	# Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHHFFSBN
24.29/3.57	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 3 cores with 720 seconds (720 total)
24.29/3.57	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 216s (1) cores
24.29/3.57	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
24.29/3.57	# Presaturation interreduction done
24.29/3.57	
24.29/3.57	# Proof found!
24.29/3.57	# SZS status Theorem
24.29/3.57	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
24.29/3.57	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
24.29/3.57	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: a > a > $o).
24.29/3.57	thf(decl_24, type, esk1_0: (a > $o) > a).
24.29/3.57	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_2: (a > $o) > a > a).
24.29/3.57	thf(decl_26, type, esk3_0: a > a).
24.29/3.57	thf(cTHM145_B_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:((![X3:a > a]:((?[X4:a]:(((X1 @ (X3 @ X4) @ X4)&(X1 @ X4 @ (X3 @ X4))))<=(![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=>(X1 @ (X3 @ X5) @ (X3 @ X6))))&![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=>(X1 @ (X3 @ X5) @ (X3 @ X6)))))))<=(![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X7)<=((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X6 @ X7))))&![X8:a > $o]:(((![X7:a]:(((X8 @ X7)=>(X1 @ X7 @ (X2 @ X8))))&![X9:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X8) @ X9)<=![X10:a]:(((X1 @ X10 @ X9)<=(X8 @ X10))))))&![X7:a]:(((X1 @ X7 @ (X2 @ X8))<=(X8 @ X7)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.t37hY4bCue/E---3.1_22244.p', cTHM145_B_pme)).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:(((![X5:a, X6:a, X7:a]:((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X6 @ X7))=>(X1 @ X5 @ X7)))&![X8:a > $o]:(((![X7:a]:(((X8 @ X7)=>(X1 @ X7 @ (X2 @ X8))))&![X9:a]:((![X10:a]:(((X8 @ X10)=>(X1 @ X10 @ X9)))=>(X1 @ (X2 @ X8) @ X9))))&![X7:a]:(((X8 @ X7)=>(X1 @ X7 @ (X2 @ X8)))))))=>![X3:a > a]:((![X5:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X6)=>(X1 @ (X3 @ X5) @ (X3 @ X6))))=>?[X4:a]:(((X1 @ (X3 @ X4) @ X4)&(X1 @ X4 @ (X3 @ X4))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM145_B_pme])])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X29:a, X30:a, X31:a, X32:a > $o, X33:a, X34:a, X36:a, X38:a, X39:a, X40:a]:((((~(epred1_0 @ X29 @ X30)|~(epred1_0 @ X30 @ X31)|(epred1_0 @ X29 @ X31))&(((~(X32 @ X33)|(epred1_0 @ X33 @ (esk1_0 @ X32)))&(((X32 @ (esk2_2 @ X32 @ X34))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X32) @ X34))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X32 @ X34) @ X34)|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X32) @ X34))))&(~(X32 @ X36)|(epred1_0 @ X36 @ (esk1_0 @ X32)))))&((~(epred1_0 @ X38 @ X39)|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X38) @ (esk3_0 @ X39)))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X40) @ X40)|~(epred1_0 @ X40 @ (esk3_0 @ X40)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X5:a, X6:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X6)|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X5 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X6:a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X6)))|~((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X8:a > $o, X4:a]:(((X8 @ (esk2_2 @ X8 @ X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X8) @ X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X8:a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ X8))|~((X8 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > a, X4:a, X13:a > a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (X3 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X3 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X13 @ Z0))))) @ X4)) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X3 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X13 @ Z0)))))) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ (X13 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X3 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X13 @ Z0))))) @ X4)) @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a > a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0))) @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0)))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_6])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X8:a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X8) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X8 @ X4) @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))) @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > a, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ (X3 @ Z0)))))))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (X3 @ (esk3_0 @ X4)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_4])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))) @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:((~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ X4))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X4))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
24.29/3.57	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
24.29/3.57	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
24.29/3.57	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
24.29/3.57	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
24.29/3.57	# Initial clauses                      : 7
24.29/3.57	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
24.29/3.57	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
24.29/3.57	# Processed clauses                    : 769
24.29/3.57	# ...of these trivial                  : 118
24.29/3.57	# ...subsumed                          : 235
24.29/3.57	# ...remaining for further processing  : 416
24.29/3.57	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
24.29/3.57	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
24.29/3.57	# Backward-subsumed                    : 29
24.29/3.57	# Backward-rewritten                   : 39
24.29/3.57	# Generated clauses                    : 39506
24.29/3.57	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33989
24.29/3.57	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
24.29/3.57	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
24.29/3.57	# Paramodulations                      : 39344
24.29/3.57	# Factorizations                       : 161
24.29/3.57	# NegExts                              : 0
24.29/3.57	# Equation resolutions                 : 1
24.29/3.57	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
24.29/3.57	# Total rewrite steps                  : 5885
24.29/3.57	# ...of those cached                   : 5134
24.29/3.57	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional check models        : 0
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
24.29/3.57	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
24.29/3.57	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
24.29/3.57	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
24.29/3.57	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
24.29/3.57	# Current number of processed clauses  : 342
24.29/3.57	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 82
24.29/3.57	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
24.29/3.57	#    Negative unit clauses             : 14
24.29/3.57	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 246
24.29/3.57	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 32778
24.29/3.57	# ...number of literals in the above   : 100999
24.29/3.57	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
24.29/3.57	# Current number of archived clauses   : 74
24.29/3.57	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10347
24.29/3.57	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8762
24.29/3.57	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 258
24.29/3.57	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2249
24.29/3.57	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
24.29/3.57	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1688
24.29/3.57	# BW rewrite match successes           : 48
24.29/3.57	# Condensation attempts                : 769
24.29/3.57	# Condensation successes               : 9
24.29/3.57	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 10203470
24.29/3.57	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 436
24.29/3.57	
24.29/3.57	# -------------------------------------------------
24.29/3.57	# User time                : 2.871 s
24.29/3.57	# System time              : 0.110 s
24.29/3.57	# Total time               : 2.981 s
24.29/3.57	# Maximum resident set size: 1868 pages
24.29/3.57	
24.29/3.57	# -------------------------------------------------
24.29/3.57	# User time                : 8.713 s
24.29/3.57	# System time              : 0.243 s
24.29/3.57	# Total time               : 8.956 s
24.29/3.57	# Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
24.29/3.57	% E exiting
24.29/3.57	% E exiting
24.29/3.57	EOF
